- #Dxo photolab elite differences update
- #Dxo photolab elite differences pro
- #Dxo photolab elite differences software
- #Dxo photolab elite differences trial
I must admit I've given up trying to keep track of Lightroom version numbers. Otherwise, you'll be using the dng conversion route. However, LR supports a wider range of cameras,īut Lightroom 6.1 only natively supports raw from cameras that were current at the time. If you have any noise problems, shoot raw, and use a supported camera DxO is the best tool for the job IMO. It depends on your camera and your requirements?ĭxO's best feature, DeepPRIME, only works with raw images taken on a supported camera. *And once in a blue moon, for a variety of reasons, I use other raw conversion software: Sony Image Data Converter, RawTherapee, Phase One Capture One Express, and Konica Minolta DiMage Master Lite, and I've briefly experimented with a few others.
#Dxo photolab elite differences update
If yours is actually on 6.1, then I suggest you update it. Also, LR 6's Print module is far ahead of DxO's printing capability-although about a year ago I got Qimage Ultimate and now I much prefer to use that for almost all photo printing.įWIW, the last perpetual-license version of LR is 6.14. So why do I still use LR 6? For raw conversion, mainly because it will process the DNG raw files from my Samsung Galaxy S7 phone but DxO will not, and the same for the DNG raw files from my Canon compacts using the CHDK firmware hack. I also subjectively like the DxO controls and workflow better than the LR controls and workflow. I also feel that PL 4 is far ahead of LR 6 in other important areas, like power / flexibility of color adjustment controls. IME DxO PhotoLab 4 Elite is simply technically better than Adobe Lightroom 6 in several ways, noise reduction and profiled lens corrections being two of the biggest ones. When Lightroom 7 was available only by subscription, I stopped upgrading LR. I've upgraded to each new DxO version (six major-version upgrades), and I upgraded from Lightroom 5 to Lightroom 6.
#Dxo photolab elite differences pro
Today I use both DxO PhotoLab 4 Elite and Adobe Lightroom 6.* For a few years I used in parallel the then-current DxO and Adobe products, starting with DxO Optics Pro 9 and Adobe Lightroom 5.
#Dxo photolab elite differences software
Others software versus the original LR that might make measurable step-function change improvements?
#Dxo photolab elite differences trial
Others software versus the original LR that might make measurable step-function change improvements? Thanks.īefore I download the trial version and spend a lot of time pixel peeping and comparing, testing functionality, just hoped to get a sample perspective of how materially different, better and worse DxO is to it.
Main area of specific interest is probably more geared around MFT but I also shoot FF too and obviously would have applicability there I assume.īefore I download the trial version and spend a lot of time pixel peeping and comparing, testing functionality, just hoped to get a sample perspective of how materially different, better and worse DxO is to it. However, I do wonder about alternative editing software like DxO PhotoLab 4 and in particular whether any key features like their promoted "DENOISING AND DEMOSAICING" features are materially better than the what is available in the noise reduction features of LR 6.1. Believe I am fairly proficient with getting most out of the older version of LR. I have used and been reasonably happy with Lightroom and never felt I really wanted or could afford a subscription based service (I know there is a whole debate about 'value' of the subscription service), but putting that to the side, wanted to discuss the captioned.
Appreciate perspectives from people that may have used both.
0 kommentar(er)
